Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux.ubuntu    |    I preferred Xubuntu, seemed a bit faster    |    134,474 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 132,592 of 134,474    |
|    J.O. Aho to Paulo da Silva    |
|    Re: btrfs seems extremely slow on kernel    |
|    14 Jul 22 19:11:54    |
      XPost: alt.os.linux       From: user@example.net              On 14/07/2022 18.34, Paulo da Silva wrote:              >> I would recommend you check up changes in the crypto layer too.       >>       >> Also it could be a combination of crypto + btrfs, but should in such       >> case been resolved in later kernel versions.       > Are there any parameters I can play with in the crypto layer?              Much depends on the crypto layer you are using, there was some years ago       some changes in luksfs that made some performance difference depending       if you had older/newer type of "crypto-key".              I tend to be quite conservative when I use encryption to change on the       settings, so that I don't break it, so I usually use defaults.              Not sure how it's with other cryptos like VeraCrypt/TrueCrypt and so on...              --               //Aho              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca