Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux.ubuntu    |    I preferred Xubuntu, seemed a bit faster    |    134,474 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 132,632 of 134,474    |
|    Mike Easter to Ray Hughes    |
|    Re: "Pending Update of Firefox snap" Err    |
|    23 Jul 22 09:52:41    |
      -address--so-tickle-me> 4da87b01       From: MikeE@ster.invalid              Ray Hughes wrote:       > I wonder, does anyone know what Linus thinks of Snaps       > if he thinks of them at all.              Ha. LT is unhappy w/ 'everything' (related to packaging) which of       course includes snaps. He's sorta source oriented. (last link)              At the risk of my getting beat up again for having an opinion and being       a 'narcist', my preferred packing is a .deb for the version of Ub repo/s       I use for my Mint everyday driver.              *BUT* I acknowledge that the .deb packaging is a major 'breach' of the       ideas of unifying packaging around 'one' type of package, and the       'expectation' that dev/s should 'have to' satisfy all of the 'myriad'       different packaging schemes is 'terrible'.              And, I think Snaps are one of the *worst* solutions. I think it would       be 'nice' if there were some kind of middle ground that made it simple       to be able to use such as a flatpak or appimage instead of having to go       'all the way back' to source, so that it would be easier than compiling       from source to 'derive' a 'fatter' package into a .deb or .rpm or whichever.               |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca