Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux.ubuntu    |    I preferred Xubuntu, seemed a bit faster    |    134,474 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 132,936 of 134,474    |
|    Paul to Marco Moock    |
|    Re: Hddetemp vs hddtemp    |
|    18 Sep 22 13:21:42    |
      XPost: alt.os.linux.mageia, comp.sys.raspberry-pi       From: nospam@needed.invalid              On 9/18/2022 9:24 AM, Marco Moock wrote:       > Am Sonntag, 18. September 2022, um 23:09:24 Uhr schrieb Daniel65:       >       >> Is Hddtemp just a spinning drive-type tool or is it applicable for       >> Solid State Drives as well??       >       > Why should that matter?       > There is a temperature sensor that need to be read out, regardless of       > the technology the disk uses.       > But according to the other post hddtemp is very old, so it is from a       > time where SSD weren't common.       >              For reasons that escape pretty well everyone, the SMART table on       legacy HDD and on the new SSD, don't match. You would think there       would be value, having entries with the same name, at their       traditional address. I would guess that is too easy.              Some environment information is pinned out in ACPI tables, such as       CoreTemp from your CPU. One of the improvements in reading the       hardware monitor interface on the SuperIO, was for the BIOS to       wrap some of the information, making it easier for userland applications       to "consume" the information. For example, the scaling resistors on       the voltage measurement section, if you use the ACPI table, the       voltages are already scaled for you. And that saves an unbelievable       amount of labor. In the past, humans used to submit empirically       derived scale resistor info, to the maintainer of MBM5, per motherboard       design. And that sucked as a method. Having the correct values       computed by the BIOS designer, and passed via ACPI table, made       so much more sense.              But not everything in life is that easy. Thus, we're still fiddling       with SMART tables in the year 2022.              I assume NVMe temperature is the same as SATA SSD, but that would       be a rash assumption unless verified. Even an eMMC chip, could have       its temperature information, delivered in some other way. And USB       flash sticks, I've never seen a measured value printed on a screen,       for those.               Paul              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca