home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.os.linux.ubuntu      I preferred Xubuntu, seemed a bit faster      134,474 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 133,058 of 134,474   
   Bobbie Sellers to Mike Easter   
   Re: KDE Neon vs Snap   
   26 Oct 22 22:18:44   
   
   From: bliss@mouse-potato.com   
      
   On 10/24/22 07:46, Mike Easter wrote:   
   > Henry Crun wrote:   
   >> Mike Easter wrote:   
   >>> Another Ub derivative goes its own way vs Snap.   
   >>>   
   >>> KDE Neon 221023 based on Ub 22.04 & KDE 5.26.1 departs Ub's big idea   
   >>> of Snap and such as Snap Firefox.   
   >>>   
   >>> It says:   
   >>>   
   >>> snap list   
   >>> no snaps are installed   
   >>>   
   >>> It also says that its repo/s include the mozillateam .ppa for its Ffx   
   >>> 106.0.1, which repo also contains Tb 102.4 .deb.   
   >>>   
   >>> Neon does have an operative Flatpak/flathub.   
   >>>   
   >>>   
   >>   
   >> the difference is:   
   >>   
   >> $ snap list   
   >>   
   >> Command 'snap' not found, but can be installed with:   
   >> sudo apt install snapd   
   >>   
   > Yes, you are correct; snapd is installed in the live default.   
   >   
   > The default Discover Settings shows flatpak checked, firmware updates   
   > only linux vendor firmware service checked, snap appears to be 'checked'   
   > but it is not blue color check like flatpak and the KDE Neon repo/s   
   > which are also designated default.   
   >   
   > I'm not sure I completely understand how to interpret the Discover   
   > settings graphical 'meaning'.   
   >   
   > The Discover 'treatment' of options for flatpak are distinctly different   
   > from its graphical treatment of snap, firmware updates, and kde neon   
   > repo/s.  Not only does flatpak have a function to make default and add   
   > source, but it also has a trashcan to remove it.   
   >   
   > I don't see a function in Discover to remove snap; so apparently   
   > Discover handles its Snap function differently than it does its flatpak   
   > function.   
   >   
   > Puzzling.   
   >   
   >   
   	Sorry to hear that the updates have gotten so weird.   
   	Don't care for the concepts in Flatpaks or in Snaps but   
   then after paying for yearly or bi yearly updates to Mandriva   
   for 5 years then to be left without help and a computer that   
   was very unhappy with 2011.  Probably why I prefer a sturdy   
   Rolling Relase and am now using Linux 6.0.5 & KDE 5.26.2.   
   Delivered via apt-rpm via Synaptic.   
      
   The thill of a working new kernel and getting my Usenet   
   connection back after a glitch at the server is like   
   a taste of my youth.   
   	   
   	bliss   
   --   
   bliss dash SF 4 ever at dslextreme dot com   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca