home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.os.linux.ubuntu      I preferred Xubuntu, seemed a bit faster      134,474 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 133,236 of 134,474   
   Nic to pinnerite   
   Re: samba problem - I think   
   12 Mar 23 12:15:30   
   
   XPost: alt.os.linux.mint, alt.os.linux.mageia, uk.d-i-y   
   From: Nic@none.net   
      
   On Sun, 12 Mar 2023 15:46:45 +0000   
   pinnerite  wrote:   
      
   >On Sun, 12 Mar 2023 03:06:11 -0400   
   >Paul  wrote:   
   >   
   >> On 3/10/2023 9:39 PM, Paul wrote:   
   >> > On 3/10/2023 2:25 PM, pinnerite wrote:   
   >> >> For many years I have had to retain two Windows virtual machines,   
   >> >> running on a Linux host and VirtualBox.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> I need Windows XP for a large home-grown 16 bit programe and for a   
   >> >> programme that drives a Fujitsu cut-sheet feeder-scanner.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> Windows 10 is for professional software not available on any other   
   >> >> platform.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> The data files are all on Linux partitions and accessed from Windows   
   >> >> using samba.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> I have to use the lowest security protocol for Windows to access the   
   >> >> data.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> Today, I discovered that from both Windows I could not longer access   
   >> >> the data.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> Eventually I powered down and then up again using a drive last cloned   
   >> >> in December 2022.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> Everything worked perfectly.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> So it seems an update has clobbered my machine.   
   >> >>   
   >> >> Has anyone else using samba suffered from this problem?   
   >> >>   
   >> >> TIA, Alan   
   >> >   
   >> > There is SMB1, SMB2, SMB3.   
   >>   
   >> it took me quite a while to tip my Linux drive upright again.   
   >> (A restore from backup didn't quite do what it was supposed to do.)   
   >>   
   >> I did a do-partial-upgrade on a 20.04.3 to 20.04.5 and   
   >> the 4.15 SAMBA came in. Initially, nothing worked.   
   >>   
   >> I added these to smb.conf, as an experiment.   
   >>   
   >> server min protocol = NT1   
   >> client min protocol = NT1   
   >> client lanman auth = yes   
   >> ntlm auth = yes   
   >>   
   >> and EVERYTHING worked after that. My test share ("server test") on   
   >> Ubuntu 20.04.5 worked (it was set up a while back), as well as the   
   >> client worked with a Windows 11 that had SMBV1 turned on in Windows   
   Features.   
   >>   
   >>     Paul   
   >   
   >I just ran up a clean 21.1 installation.   
   >Virtual XP still cannot access the Linux folders.   
   >   
   >Alan   
   >   
   >   
   >--   
   >Mint 20.3, kernel 5.4.0-139-generic, Cinnamon 5.2.7   
   >running on an AMD Phenom II X4 Black edition processor with 16GB of   
   >DRAM.   
      
   Given that you are using a m$ product to drive a machine, it might be more   
   cost effective to look at some of those dell laptop latitudes selling for   
   around $100. The cost of the machine includes a license for w7 or w10, the   
   cost of the machine is almost    
   equal to the cost of the license. Using a dedicated machine would seem to   
   answer your problem.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca