Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux.ubuntu    |    I preferred Xubuntu, seemed a bit faster    |    134,474 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 133,974 of 134,474    |
|    Killadebug to Dr. Noah Bodie    |
|    Re: Is There Something Better Than TimeS    |
|    18 Aug 24 20:39:51    |
      XPost: alt.os.linux.mint       From: killadebug@mouse-potato.com              On Sun, 18 Aug 2024 14:09:18 -0300, Dr. Noah Bodie wrote:              > I'm finding that TS does NOT do 100% restorations of the system files.       > Recently I did an update that broke the OS (I lost my internet       > connection, I lost several apps, etc.) so I used TS to restore an       > earlier working OS.       >       > The problem was some of the changes that the update made were not       > reversed by the restoration.       >       > This is the second time that TS has failed to do a       > 100%-return-to-previous-condition,       > so I'm wondering if there is something more reliable than TS.       >       > Something that WILL return the system 100% to the way that it was.              Been using Timeshift for years, my system uses btrfs so snapshots are made       in an instant. I keep 1 weekly, 1 daily, and 3 hourly. Never had an issue.       my btrfs subvolumes are @ which = root and @home which = home,       bulletproof. Not a backup system....I do that weekly using clonezilla.....                            --       Pull my finger              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca