Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux.ubuntu    |    I preferred Xubuntu, seemed a bit faster    |    134,474 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 134,139 of 134,474    |
|    Carlos E.R. to Jim    |
|    Re: New reason for Disk Management ("Shr    |
|    26 Jan 25 03:29:31    |
      XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-10       From: robin_listas@es.invalid              On 2025-01-26 03:06, Jim wrote:       > On 25/01/2025 15:55, Alan K. wrote:       >> On 1/25/25 10:36 AM, Paul wrote:              ...              >> More reason to keep a spare Win7 machine /disk around huh.       >>       >       > What is Linux version of disk-check? In windows it takes hours as stated       > above but what about Ubuntu?? What command to use to check this?       >              fsck. You also have badblocks.              > I have a 2 TB disk that is slow and showing signs of wear & tear so I       > tried to clone it on a new SSD 1TB disk. Acronis states that it is       > possible to clone on to a smaller disk as long as the actual data is not       > more than the size of the target disk. The source has about 350GB of       > data (out of 2TB disk size) but this can't be cloned because the disk       > has bad clusters according to Acronis. So how do I correct this in Linux       > ubuntu?              Write to the bad sectors to force them to remap.              > x-posted to ubuntu as well just in case they can respond quickly.              Better start a new thread in any of the linux groups, the Windows folks       will not be very happy.              --       Cheers, Carlos.              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca