Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux.ubuntu    |    I preferred Xubuntu, seemed a bit faster    |    134,474 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 134,231 of 134,474    |
|    Paul to vjp2.at@at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.co    |
|    Re: USB Win to Ubuntu    |
|    28 Feb 25 00:44:05    |
      From: nospam@needed.invalid              On Tue, 2/25/2025 6:42 PM, vjp2.at@at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com wrote:       > Fixed it my chkdsk in WinXP       > Phew       >              Just for the record, the NTFS "standard" isn't much of a standard.       The further the CHKDSK version is, from the version that created       the file system, the more damage the CHKDSK can do.              If I use the windows 7 CHKDSK on a Windows 10 C: drive, it removes       the Extended Attributes. This does no permanent damage, but it       also makes a permanent change to the file system in a sense.       On the other hand, the Windows 7 CHKDSK repairs $BITMAP, and       sometimes it is worth it for that function, so the Extended       Attribute damage is a tradeoff worth making.              The problem with Windows XP, is the treatment of System Volume Information       and "Restore Points" if present. It can remove them. The Windows XP       Restore Point logic is not compatible with later versions of such.              For a "Data Drive", there is no problem with any of this really.       It's the C: drives that suffer a bit, depending on which CHKDSK       you select. A "Data Drive" uses hardly any optional features       of NTFS 3.1 .               Paul              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca