XPost: comp.os.linux.misc, comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.os.linux   
   From: rotflol2@hotmail.com   
      
   ["Followup-To:" header set to comp.os.linux.misc.]   
   On 2025-05-24, 🇵🇱Jacek Marcin Jaworski🇵🇱    
   wrote:   
   > W dniu 24.05.2025 o 01:42, CtrlAltDel pisze:   
   >> On Fri, 23 May 2025 09:17:04 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> On 22/05/2025 21:14, CtrlAltDel wrote:   
   >>>> On Thu, 22 May 2025 16:03:33 -0000 (UTC), Borax Man wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> What programs will the children be using?  What d you want them to be   
   >>>>> able to do, and not be able to do?   
   >>>>   
   >>>> I don't have any children living at my home any longer.  I was just   
   >>>> wondering if Ubuntu was made for children or perhaps people with   
   >>>> learning disabilities who should not be given full access to their   
   >>>> operating system.   
   >>>   
   >>> Of course not. Its made for people who want to USE linux, not constantly   
   >>> fiddle with it.   
   >>   
   >> Ubuntu, with the Gnome Desktop Environment, is for people that have mental   
   >> disabilities that affect their reasoning skills and Canonical decided they   
   >> would create a distro for them.  It's for people that can't be trusted to   
   >> behave in a rational manner and must have their usage of Linux crippled by   
   >> those who know better than they do.   
   >>   
   >> Even in Ubuntu Cinnamon, the file manager natively displays / and all you   
   >> need to do is right click and select open as root to be able to access   
   >> your system files.   
   >>   
   >> https://i.imgur.com/JiTcqzO.jpeg   
   >   
   > This is not ture and totally unfair! Ubuntu is friendly and stable and   
   > usable, even in commercial. Canonical give you choice what desktop   
   > flavor you want - this is also very friedndly - not all distros are made   
   > that way. Canonical now support LTS relases for 12 years.   
   >   
   > The problem with Canonical is that they don't respond to emails with   
   > these questions:   
   > - How many cost iso image download service per user?   
   > - How many cost sudo apt update && sudo apt upgrade per user per monht?   
   > - How many donation do you expect from honest user? Please specify your   
   > expectations per each workstation and per each server?   
   > - What should I do to make a donation that will be fairly   
   > separated/divided between Kubuntu, Canonical, and free software suppliers?   
      
   Canonical have made some questionable decisions in the past.  I never   
   used Ubuntu myself (no real need), but I did consider it a good distro   
   for those new to Linux, due to the rather stellar work making a   
   functional.   
      
   However, there have been some questionable things that have been done to   
   Ubuntu.   
      
   Snaps are, to put it mildly, quite odd.   
   Canonical has, like many others in the tech sector, embraced ESG and DEI.   
      
   Ubuntu can collect data on you.  They are open, it can be turned off,   
   but I would prefer a distro that didn't attempt that or try to normalise   
   such practices.  It may or may not be a slippery slope, but the last   
   person I helped install Linux on was *very* sensetive of tracking, and   
   trust in Linux and Free Software would be greatly eroded if the   
   capability was there.   
      
   Using the rust version of SUDO.   
   and some other stuff   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)