home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.os.linux.ubuntu      I preferred Xubuntu, seemed a bit faster      134,474 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 134,376 of 134,474   
   Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOlivei to Paul   
   Re: Make bootable Ubuntu installer thumb   
   16 Sep 25 02:55:53   
   
   From: ldo@nz.invalid   
      
   On Mon, 15 Sep 2025 22:34:30 -0400, Paul wrote:   
      
   > On Mon, 9/15/2025 7:49 PM, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:   
   >>   
   >> On Mon, 15 Sep 2025 13:33:17 -0700, bilsch01 wrote:   
   >>   
   >>> I want to create a bootable Ubuntu installer thumb drive using Win11.   
   >>   
   >> You could install WSL2 and take advantage of its Linux functionality,   
   >> like the “dd” command.   
   >>   
   >>   
   > Yikes.   
   >   
   > You can do better than that.   
      
   You can on a native Linux system, but we’re trying to get to that.   
      
   > That gives you "dd.exe", to be run in a Windows Administrator terminal   
   > session. The tool was previously "rawrite" and the name changed to "dd"   
   > at some point. It is an acquired taste (does not detect the end of the   
   > source disk properly for one kind of media, not a big deal).   
      
   A load of crap, in other words.   
      
   > The WSL2 does not have a working /dev layer. It's not designed to hack   
   > around or subvert Windows itself. The people who worked on WSL,   
   > evidence points to them being pretty skilled at what they did.   
      
   But maybe not skilled enough. Does “lsblk” work? Does the content of   
   /proc/self/mountinfo show anything sensible?   
      
   > The Linux "dd" might work on those, but I don't think there is much   
   > profit to be had, by doing so.   
      
   So much for being “skilled”, eh?   
      
   > And if we look at mounts...   
   >   
   > $ ls /mnt   
   > c  d  e  f  g  h  i  k  s  wsl  wslg   
   >   
   > it's a pretty fuzzy collection of stuff you could just as easily attack   
   > from the Windows side.   
      
   That’s not how you normally query what’s mounted. Try the “df” command.   
      
   > Using the Linux "dd" from there, is not a big help.   
      
   You might be right.   
      
   > However, if you use Windows VirtualBox and had the PUEL hardware   
   > passthru installed (as a home user, not for commercial use), then you   
   > could connect a USB stick to the PC, and via passthru, a Linux LiveDVD   
   > in VirtualBox could be used to write to the USB stick. Similarly, you   
   > could run Linux VirtualBox, and using the passthru, do the same thing.   
   > The passthru does not work for everything (you can't boot from a USB   
   > stick via passthru), but for a limited set of tasks, you can succeed via   
   > passthru. Maybe even a USB DVD writer could be run that way. A regular   
   > DVD writer over a SATA cable, does not normally work,   
   > but you might succeed over USB.   
      
   Windows just doesn’t want to make it easy, does it?   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca