Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux.ubuntu    |    I preferred Xubuntu, seemed a bit faster    |    134,474 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 134,376 of 134,474    |
|    Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOlivei to Paul    |
|    Re: Make bootable Ubuntu installer thumb    |
|    16 Sep 25 02:55:53    |
      From: ldo@nz.invalid              On Mon, 15 Sep 2025 22:34:30 -0400, Paul wrote:              > On Mon, 9/15/2025 7:49 PM, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:       >>       >> On Mon, 15 Sep 2025 13:33:17 -0700, bilsch01 wrote:       >>       >>> I want to create a bootable Ubuntu installer thumb drive using Win11.       >>       >> You could install WSL2 and take advantage of its Linux functionality,       >> like the “dd” command.       >>       >>       > Yikes.       >       > You can do better than that.              You can on a native Linux system, but we’re trying to get to that.              > That gives you "dd.exe", to be run in a Windows Administrator terminal       > session. The tool was previously "rawrite" and the name changed to "dd"       > at some point. It is an acquired taste (does not detect the end of the       > source disk properly for one kind of media, not a big deal).              A load of crap, in other words.              > The WSL2 does not have a working /dev layer. It's not designed to hack       > around or subvert Windows itself. The people who worked on WSL,       > evidence points to them being pretty skilled at what they did.              But maybe not skilled enough. Does “lsblk” work? Does the content of       /proc/self/mountinfo show anything sensible?              > The Linux "dd" might work on those, but I don't think there is much       > profit to be had, by doing so.              So much for being “skilled”, eh?              > And if we look at mounts...       >       > $ ls /mnt       > c d e f g h i k s wsl wslg       >       > it's a pretty fuzzy collection of stuff you could just as easily attack       > from the Windows side.              That’s not how you normally query what’s mounted. Try the “df” command.              > Using the Linux "dd" from there, is not a big help.              You might be right.              > However, if you use Windows VirtualBox and had the PUEL hardware       > passthru installed (as a home user, not for commercial use), then you       > could connect a USB stick to the PC, and via passthru, a Linux LiveDVD       > in VirtualBox could be used to write to the USB stick. Similarly, you       > could run Linux VirtualBox, and using the passthru, do the same thing.       > The passthru does not work for everything (you can't boot from a USB       > stick via passthru), but for a limited set of tasks, you can succeed via       > passthru. Maybe even a USB DVD writer could be run that way. A regular       > DVD writer over a SATA cable, does not normally work,       > but you might succeed over USB.              Windows just doesn’t want to make it easy, does it?              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca