Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux.mint    |    Looks pretty on the outside, thats it!    |    30,566 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 28,896 of 30,566    |
|    Alan K. to Paul    |
|    Re: caja flooding xsession-errors    |
|    14 Aug 25 07:53:48    |
      From: alan@invalid.com              On 8/14/25 3:01 AM, Paul wrote:       > On Wed, 8/13/2025 5:32 PM, Russell Gadd wrote:       >> Mint 22.1 Mate. Anyone seen rapidly increasing ~/.xsession-errors file with       this sort of message?       >> (caja:1616): GLib-GIO-CRITICAL       >> GFileInfo created without standard::symlink-target       >>       >> tried to find problem via ChatGPT but no success       >>       >       > You don't need ChatGPT to track things like that down.       >       > The "answer" is sort of available here, but the "disposition",       > how do we fix it, is evident by looking at the lineup info       > on Distrowatch for the packaging.       >       > "2023-11-26"       >       > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/caja/+bug/2044635       >       > "Seems caja 1.27.2 has fixed that issue; please merge it from master       asap"       >       > Something tells me "this will be messy". Getting to that revision       > number or later, will be tough. Not even a PPA guarantees a       > clean transition, because Clem Customization could be affected       > if you change the "package alignment".       >       > https://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?t=414780       >       > Here is a picture of my situation in a virtual machine.       > You can see in Distrowatch, the sequence of release numbers for       > the MATE in LinuxMint, versus the MATE upstream, and it appears       > Clem is not "moving fast and breaking things". The API version       > is not changing, so he does not have to rebuild all his customization.       > The release numbers would have "moved faster" if there was not       > a secret reason to be "dragging ones feet" about it. That is my       interpretation       > of the info in Distrowatch.       >       > [Picture]       >       > https://i.postimg.cc/yNhDDphd/LM221-MATE-Caja-Is-Old.gif       >       > If it bothers you, you could install another DE than MATE, like a Cinnamon.       >       > If the whole desktop did not rely on that file and its release       > number, this would be a LOT easier to fix. Clem could fix it,       > but the answers/comments I've seen from Clem before, he deflects       > to upstream, and that's not what is required in this case. I get the       > impression, Clem only wants to update MATE about every five years,       > as a forklift change. It's not like magically in LM22.2 this would       > be fixed. I would bet the sub-version would not change enough to       > achieve any result, let alone the fix you want.       >       > Paul       Could Nemo be installed as a substitute file manager for a while?              --       Linux Mint 22.1, Thunderbird 128.13.0esr, Mozilla Firefox 141.0.3        Alan K.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca