Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux.mint    |    Looks pretty on the outside, thats it!    |    30,566 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 29,340 of 30,566    |
|    Edmund to Paul    |
|    Re: Dual monitiors different resolutions    |
|    20 Oct 25 12:51:35    |
      From: nomail@hotmail.com              On 10/20/25 12:07, Paul wrote:       > On Mon, 10/20/2025 4:42 AM, Edmund wrote:       >> On 10/20/25 06:51, Paul wrote:       >>> On Sun, 10/19/2025 9:36 AM, Edmund wrote:       >>>> Dual monitiors different resolutions, expert needed.       >>>>       >>>>       >>>> Monitor 1080, TV 2160       >>>>       >>>> Now I want to use streams and movies in 4k on my TV       >>>> and a READABLE!!! start menu displayed on the TV in order to start       >>>> applications. This and other texts in a readable size, so it must be       >>>> resized on the TV only, not on the monitor.       >>>>       >>>> So it would look like in the screen mirror option.       >>>> Is this even possible?       >>>>       >>>> I found "scale" in the display setup, but what does it do?       >>>> Does it resize or changing ( wasting ) the resolution?       >>>       >>> There is a reference to "fractional scaling" and some       >>> capability to control individual monitors. This may require       >>> settings not seen in the Display panel. More research needed.       >>>       >>> https://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?t=377737       >>>       >>> Paul       >>>       >> Thanks, it is terrible.       >> I am considering buying a 4k monitor increase the DPI and mirror it with my       TV. That should work I guess.       >>       >       > Well, yes and no. They claim that if a PC monitor is too small       > when at the 3840x2160 native resolution mark, that the user       > is pretty well forced to run it at 200%.              Why? if the DPI setting is changing the font and icon size without       ruining the resolution, what's the problem?              Then, the -in xfce- appearance settings windows scaling - to 2, I guess       that is scaling with ruining the resolution. Don't want that.                     > If the TV is big enough,       > you may not feel inclined to be limited to that choice, and       > maybe the TV looks OK at 100% setting if it is a 75" diagonal set.              MY TV is a little smaller but playing with the DPI settings and mirror       my 1080 monitor tells me I can live with the same settings on monitor       and TV. So for both I need to increase the size/DPI to make it easy to read.       >       > So while, yes, you can buy a 4K monitor, it should bear       > some physical similarities to the TV set. Mixing a 27" 4K       > computer monitor, with a 75" 4K TV set, may still have       > some "satisfaction issues" with the results. I'm told       > (I have no evidence of this particularly), that a 32" 4K       > is "the smallest 4K you should buy". Whether the difference       > between a 27" and a 32" is that dramatic, who really knows.       >       > Just a guess.              27 and 32 is a significant difference but I have not find anything in       between.       I will take a look what is available here.                     > Paul       >       >                     --       -------------              Godspeed for Assange       Amnesty for Snowden       Rehabilitation for heroes              Edmund              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca