home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.os.linux.mint      Looks pretty on the outside, thats it!      30,566 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 29,503 of 30,566   
   vallor to Paul   
   Re: DistroWatch Q&A: Advice for new Linu   
   29 Oct 25 20:34:33   
   
   XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-10   
   From: vallor@vallor.earth   
      
   At Wed, 29 Oct 2025 08:50:09 -0400, Paul  wrote:   
      
   > On Wed, 10/29/2025 8:42 AM, Felix wrote:   
   > > Felix wrote:   
   > >> Dan Purgert wrote:   
   > >>> On 2025-10-27, J. P. Gilliver wrote:   
   > >>>> On 2025/10/27 17:17:7, Paul wrote:   
   > >>>>> There should be two articles. The "nyah nyah, I have new hardware"   
   > >>>>> article, and the "boo hiss, I have old hardware and can't afford   
   > >>>> Or, "I have old hardware which did all I wanted it to do".   
   > >>> So far, the only hardware I've run into that slams into *that* wall was   
   > >>> some 32-bit POS from 200x ... it still "runs", but "mainstream distros"   
   > >>> are out.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> Granted, I also have just enough awareness to realize that I can't   
   > >>> "demand" that someone else keep spending their time on 32bit support   
   > >>> just because I have an antique that I want to keep running.   
   > >>>   
   > >>> All my 64-bit stuff from 2010/2012 onwards seems to not have any   
   > >>> troubles even with the newer distros, barring a few cases of "dammit   
   > >>> broadcom" that I fixed with some realtek USB dongle.   
   > >>>   
   > >>   
   > >> I have 10 -15 yo PC's here running LM 21.3 no issues   
   > >>   
   > >   
   > > p.s. I leave them at 21.3 because someone said 22+ is for newer machines   
   > >   
   >   
   > Test and see.   
   >   
   > That's what I'm running right now, is install tests.   
   >   
   > The results are pure weirdness, for sure.   
   >   
   > For example, everything I've installed so far, has   
   > exactly the same GLXGEARS results. One claims to be   
   > pure X11, another might be Wayland. There is supposed   
   > to be a difference here... because I tested for this   
   > before, and Wayland ran at half the speed of X11.   
   > It would seem the video card is somehow smothering   
   > the detail.   
   >   
   >    Paul   
      
   By default, glxgears syncs to vblank.  To unlock it:   
      
   $ vblank_mode=0 __GL_SYNC_TO_VBLANK=0 glxgears   
   106787 frames in 5.0 seconds = 21357.289 FPS   
   108361 frames in 5.0 seconds = 21671.984 FPS   
   108247 frames in 5.0 seconds = 21648.572 FPS   
   ^C   
      
   --   
   -v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090Ti 24G   
      OS: Linux 6.17.5 D: Mint 22.2 DE: Xfce 4.18   
      NVIDIA: 580.95.05 Mem: 258G   
      "This space intentionally left"   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca