Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux.mint    |    Looks pretty on the outside, thats it!    |    30,566 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 29,523 of 30,566    |
|    Daniel70 to J. P. Gilliver    |
|    Re: DistroWatch Q&A: Advice for new Linu    |
|    30 Oct 25 19:54:04    |
      XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-10       From: daniel47@nomail.afraid.org              On 30/10/2025 1:03 am, J. P. Gilliver wrote:       > On 2025/10/29 11:0:20, Daniel70 wrote:       >> On 28/10/2025 5:38 am, J. P. Gilliver wrote:       >       > []       >       >       >>> The usual response is something like "why should we expend effort       >>> supporting old hardware" (especially if it requires different drivers).       >>       >> But 'they' aren't "supporting old hardware", they are supporting       >> hardware when it is current (5 years ago, 10 years ago, whatever), they       >> are DISABLING support for 'old' hardware.       >>       >> That is ... if they just left what they had THERE and then added stuff       >> for the NEW hardware, they could support both 'old' and 'new'!!       >       > Yes, agreed.>>       >>> Some of us oldsters - and I don't know what proportion; it may be       >>> "shamed" into not speaking up (or buying new hardware) - wonder what is       >>> it that _makes_ hardware _old_; there's certainly a strong _suspicion_       >>> that "improvements" in OSs are mostly countered by the higher hardware       >>> requirements it needs. In particular, I have never understood why the       >>> advances in graphics processing have been "necessary" for anyone not       >>> into gaming and its consequent rendering needs.       >>       >> I can remember when keyboards *didn't* have "Windows" keys.       >       > I can remember the eightysomething (?) ones, with ten function keys in       > two rows of five on the left. But the 100/102/whatever _are_ an       > improvement! (Though I wish they'd put the arrow keys in a diamond [and       > perhaps with home/end/pgup/pgdn in one too, or around the first one].)>       >> Function Keys, sure. CTRL Keys, sure. Alt Keys, sure.       >>       >> But no "Windows" keys!! (and there's another key there but I don't know       >> what IT's called)       >>       >> Bottom line of keys on this keyboard ....       >> CTRL Unknown Windows Alt Space Alt Windows CTRL       > If it's a laptop, probably Function (Fn),              It wasn't a Laptop but it was the Fn key.       --       Daniel70              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca