Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux.mint    |    Looks pretty on the outside, thats it!    |    30,566 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 29,902 of 30,566    |
|    Paul to pinnerite    |
|    Re: Savea rotated image in Gimp    |
|    15 Dec 25 09:48:53    |
      From: nospam@needed.invalid              On Mon, 12/15/2025 9:20 AM, pinnerite wrote:       > GIMP 2.10.36       >       > I have been scanning articles from a journal.       > When I opened them in Gimp, reversed the image that was inverted       > and exported the result, they were still inverted. I cannot remember       > this being the case in the past.       >       > I have tried to find a solution via Google but nothing seems to work.       >       > Alan              Some image formats, have a metadata bit indicating the       image should be rotated. This applies a rotation       not captured in the pixmap part.              The Linux "file" command can tell you something of the image type:               file mymysterymeat              JPG file or PNG file or TIFF file and so on.              Some scanners produce TIF, some produce PDF, and so on.       There are a few options for what you're looking at right now.              *******              Let's make up a strawman for you.              An image has the pixmap rotated. The metadata says to       rotate it some more. Alan looks at the image on his       screen, and due to the "total 360" degrees of rotation,       Alan attaches it to an email and sends it to a friend.              The friend comments "why did you send me this upside-down       image, Alan?". Then, Alan cannot figure out what is amiss,       as the image looks just dandy on Alans screen.              The problem in this case, is viewing tools do not       always honour the metadata rotation bit. Alans viewing tool       honoured the bit and added the extra rotation, the friend       of Alan with a less featureful image viewer, the metadata       bit is ignored.              I think you can see from my little strawman, that it behooves       the computer scientist preparing the image, to *remove*       the metadata rotation, then apply whatever physical rotation       is really needed. *Then*, when the friend receives the photo,       it no longer matters whether the friend has an "old" or a "new"       image viewer, the picture looks the same in all of them and       it also looks like it did on Alans screen.              Apple likes to save out images, with metadata rotation asserted.               Paul              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca