Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux.mint    |    Looks pretty on the outside, thats it!    |    30,566 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 30,046 of 30,566    |
|    Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOlivei to All    |
|    Re: Hard Drive techology    |
|    28 Dec 25 02:43:58    |
      XPost: aus.computers       From: ldo@nz.invalid              On Sun, 28 Dec 2025 11:12:22 +1000, keithr0 wrote:              > ... with any useful sort of RAID implementation, you can hot replace       > the bad drive, without the need to restore from backup.              That’s where the “high availability” comes in.              > All the data remains available throughout.              Until you discover a software bug (or an operator screwup) has deleted       an important database. Which you then need to restore from ... where?              > I spent 20 years working on large storage systems, beginning with       > boxes of 128 5 1/4" 9gig SCSI drives, going on with larger and       > larger drives dropping to 3 1/2" SCSI then Ultra SCSI, fibre channel       > and finally SOS (SCSI Over Serial) drives.              Presumably, judging from your comments, you were more on the hardware       side, not the software side.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca