Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux.mint    |    Looks pretty on the outside, thats it!    |    30,566 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 30,051 of 30,566    |
|    Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOlivei to Paul    |
|    Re: Hard Drive techology    |
|    28 Dec 25 20:44:35    |
      XPost: aus.computers       From: ldo@nz.invalid              On Sun, 28 Dec 2025 04:41:43 -0500, Paul wrote:              > The *controller* wrote to all drives at once. It was not a commanded       > write. It was a firmware issue of some sort. And not a       > capacity-rollover type flaw.       >       > It corrupted some area low in the disk storage.       >       > Causing *all volumes to be wiped out instantly*.              Let me just add that to my ever-lengthening list of reasons why I       dislike hardware RAID controllers.              If I’m going to use RAID, I recommend using the built-in Linux       software RAID. I have seen it deal with failures more than once, and       my respect for it has only gone up.              Not to mention, it’s so much easier to reconfigure without having to       mess around with obscure vendor-proprietary utilities.              > This is *why we do backups of our RAID array* :-/       >       > A RAID array is NOT a backup.              Agree, agree, thrice agree.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca