Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux.mint    |    Looks pretty on the outside, thats it!    |    30,566 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 30,156 of 30,566    |
|    Lawrence =?iso-8859-13?q?D=FFOlivei to Paul    |
|    Re: The (Non)Need For Snaps (was Re: [RE    |
|    05 Jan 26 06:19:44    |
      From: ldo@nz.invalid              On Mon, 5 Jan 2026 00:24:27 -0500, Paul wrote:              > The .deb scheme works fine. It does not need another layer of       > nonsense on top of it.              It does not. Not for open-source software, anyway. App developers       don’t have to concern themselves with packaging: they just release the       source, along with the relevant build scripts, and leave it up to the       distro maintainers to create the actual packages. This way, a single       app can support a thousand different distros, and a single distro can       support a thousand different apps, and everything scales nicely.              > It's just a make work project.              But remember why these whole snapimage/flap/apppak things were       invented: they are oriented towards appeasing developers of       *proprietary* apps. These are the people who don’t want to release       their source code. So they moan about having to support a thousand       different distros, as though it’s the fault of the Linx ecosystem that       it’s so diverse. These monolithic adjuncts to the distro-specific       packaging systems -- a parallel package universe, if you will -- are       specifically designed to take control away from the users and the       distro maintainers, and put it in the hands of those proprietary       developers.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca