Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux.mint    |    Looks pretty on the outside, thats it!    |    30,566 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 30,331 of 30,566    |
|    Handsome Jack to Mike Scott    |
|    Re: Trivial Backup dilemma    |
|    04 Feb 26 09:38:34    |
      From: jack@handsome.com              On Tue, 3 Feb 2026 08:53:10 +0000, Mike Scott wrote:              > On 03/02/2026 03:27, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:       >> On Mon, 2 Feb 2026 23:13:53 -0000 (UTC), I wrote:       >>       >>> rsync has the --link-dest option so it can do the deduping for you.       >>       >> Just to clarify, I mean deduping across different backup snapshots, to       >> avoid creating additional copies of a file that has not changed, not       >> within a single backup snapshot.       >       > Isn't this where timeshift and 'back in time' come in? They're really       > just front-ends to rsync plus scheduling of one sort or another.       > They seem to work well enough.       >       > Or are we talking archiving here, as opposed to backup? Or some mixture?              Timeshift doesn't work on non-ext4 destination disks, which rules it out       for removable disks that might have to be used on a spare Windows machine.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca