Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux.mint    |    Looks pretty on the outside, thats it!    |    30,566 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 30,418 of 30,566    |
|    Paul to All    |
|    Re: Trash (Rubbish bin) folder    |
|    11 Feb 26 04:31:43    |
      From: nospam@needed.invalid              On Wed, 2/11/2026 2:24 AM, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:       > On Wed, 11 Feb 2026 01:25:19 -0500, Paul wrote:       >       >> On Tue, 2/10/2026 7:20 PM, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:       >>>       >>> This is unlike the Windows kernel, where assumptions specific to       >>> NTFS pervade every part of the system.       >>       >> IFS Installable File System (equivalent of FUSE).       >       > Windows can only boot from NTFS. It only supports mount points on       > NTFS. It makes assumptions about the kinds of filesystems permitted on       > removable versus non-removable media.       >       > None of these restrictions apply to Linux.       >              Microsoft claims a lot of things about NTFS. In a lot       of cases, when an article would come out saying "you can       only do this on top of an NTFS", someone (small developers)       would come along and prove the statement wrong.              I only tend to believe such proclamations, if the       article happens to include an architectural reason       for the claim. Sometimes the claim stands, because       nobody can be bothered to refute it.              Apple used to do stuff like this too. It would write       a TN claiming "X filesystem can have 4 billion files,       500TB partitions, and and...". Then, thee months later,       another TN would come out "it turns out that only       16TB partitions are supported". And that's because       enthusiasts in the community, would find ways to check       the limits in the actual implementation in front of them.       I don't know if Apple have learned any lessons from       this practice or not (of making proclamations that       aren't actually true).              We've had to do stuff like that at work. Answer a       series of questions about a product for an RFQ. The       entire team (HW+SW) blocks off two weeks of time to answer       the questions, and you work in teams checking design       details to make sure no "capabilities" are inflated.       As an incorrect answer later could lead to a lawsuit.               Paul              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca