Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux.mandriva    |    Somewhat decent but also getting bloated    |    29,919 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 28,066 of 29,919    |
|    Aragorn to All    |
|    Re: Mandriva SA to transfer distro to an    |
|    26 May 12 11:10:59    |
      From: stryder@telenet.be.invalid              On Saturday 26 May 2012 04:56, Adam conveyed the following to       alt.os.linux.mandriva...              > Aragorn wrote:       >       >> On Friday 25 May 2012 17:07, Adam conveyed the following to       >> alt.os.linux.mandriva...       >       >>> Offhand, would you happen to know whether any of them prefer       >>> ext3 or ext4 for their root partitions? Or is ext4 already pretty       >>> much standard already?       >>       >> Well, when it comes to the Linux kernel, there is no such thing as a       >> standard filesystem - because it can be installed on ext2, ext3,       >> ext4, reiserfs, XFS or JFS - but most distributions now do default to       >> ext4. It is a robust and very fast filesystem.       >       > Thanks! I realize there's no absolute "standard", but I understand       > most distros have a preference or recommendation. I was thinking that       > I could use mkfs to create the filesystem for each distro while using       > my "production" distro, which would (I hope) eliminate the need to       > re-create it during installation.              Of course. ext4 is ext4 is ext4 is ext4... ;-)              Every new kernel release, there will be patches to the ext4 code - as       well as that of other filesystem types - but that's just code with       regard to how the kernel handles the on-disk data. The on-disk       filesystem structure itself remains the same. (They can't afford to       break that with every new kernel release.)              >> Do however bear in mind that if you're going to use ext4 on the       >> partition which holds the kernel images and the bootloader files,       >> then you will need grub2, as grub-legacy can't handle ext4 yet.       >       > Strange. Under Mandriva 2010.0:       >       > [adam@eris ~]$ df /       > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on       > /dev/sda5 19G 11G 7.3G 60% /       > [adam@eris ~]$ sudo grub --version       > grub (GNU GRUB 0.97)       > [adam@eris ~]$              Yes, but as I gather, ext4 support in grub-legacy is a backport from       grub2. If my sources are wrong, then I am wrong too, but I was told       that upstream grub-legacy does not have ext4 support. So if the       Mandriva grub-legacy does, then that may be because of said backport       patch.              --       = Aragorn =       (registered GNU/Linux user #223157)              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca