Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux.mandriva    |    Somewhat decent but also getting bloated    |    29,919 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 28,145 of 29,919    |
|    Bit Twister to unruh    |
|    Re: name of sys conf file containg passw    |
|    09 Jun 12 16:52:52    |
      From: BitTwister@mouse-potato.com              On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 16:42:12 GMT, unruh wrote:       >       > The problem is NOT the hash.              It is now.                     Even the DES based Unix hash is plenty       > strong (but is suscetible to brute force cracking if someone really       > wants to spend the time). You are far far better off looking elsewhere       > for the biggest security weakness in your system ( which may be how you       > choose your password) rather than worrying about the hash being used.       > Most Linux systems now use the BSD/MD5 based hash which is pleanty       > strong enough.              Well, the MD5 Author would disagree with you.              http://phk.freebsd.dk/sagas/md5crypt_eol.html?highlight=md5#md5c       ypt-password-scrambler-is-no-longer-considered-safe-by-author              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca