From: BitTwister@mouse-potato.com   
      
   On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 15:51:30 -0400, Adam wrote:   
   > Bit Twister wrote:   
   >> My solution, installed VirtualBox, and do my installs there.   
   >   
   > BT, would you have a guess at the performance hit from VirtualBox?   
      
   For your general question, ~12% cpu.   
      
   >  For example, if a native install of Haphazard Linux runs at 100%   
   > speed, how fast (very roughly) would it run under VirtualBox (with   
   > 100% performance cap)?  Any ideas if its performance cap is less   
   > than 100%?   
      
   I would have to guess performance would be like any other application   
   competing for resource plus VirtualBox overhead.   
      
   In my 4 cpu system, guest performance feels normal and "top" looks about right.   
   Host VB tasks cpu usage was around 12% whether the guest was running   
   top or not.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)