Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux.mandriva    |    Somewhat decent but also getting bloated    |    29,919 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 28,385 of 29,919    |
|    Warren Post to All    |
|    x32 or x64?    |
|    21 Jul 12 14:41:34    |
      From: invalid@invalid.invalid              Searching this NG and the web, I am left with the impression that using a       64 bit distro will only provide a noticeable improvement over 32 bits if       you have lots of RAM and a fast processor. But how much is "lots"? How       fast is "fast"? Having reached end of life, I'll soon be replacing my 32       bit mdv2010.2 with something newer. While I have no complaint with my       current 32 bits, now is a good time for me to consider the alternative.              Per hardinfo, my hardware is:              Processor : 2x Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU E2140 @ 1.60GHz       Memory : 1015MB (556MB used)       Operating System : Mandriva Linux 2010.2              The mobo can accept up to 4 GB of DDR2 RAM.              The 64 bit live versions of Crunchbang 10, Mint Debian Edition 13, Mageia       2, and mdv 2011 all work on my box, although the latter is noticeably       slower than the others.              However, my interest is in learning a general rule of thumb to apply to       hardware generally, and not simply "your box is best suited for an X bit       OS".              TIA,       --       Warren Post       http://my.opera.com/wpost/              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca