home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.os.linux.mandriva      Somewhat decent but also getting bloated      29,919 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 28,416 of 29,919   
   Adam to Aragorn   
   Re: x32 or x64?   
   29 Jul 12 18:48:20   
   
   From: adam@address.invalid   
      
   Aragorn wrote:   
   > On Saturday 21 July 2012 22:41, Warren Post conveyed the following to   
   > alt.os.linux.mandriva...   
      
   >> However, my interest is in learning a general rule of thumb to apply   
   >> to hardware generally, and not simply "your box is best suited for an   
   >> X bit OS".   
   >   
   > There is no such rule anymore, unless you're really stuck with a box   
   > that doesn't support more than 2 GiB of RAM, but which still for some   
   > reason was equipped with a 64-bit processor.   
      
   And with 64-bit hardware throughout.  My Compaq SR5210NX (bottom-end,   
   late 2007) is exactly that.  It maxed out at 2 GB, came with 32-bit   
   Vista, and I ran 32-bit OSs on it.  It wasn't until last month that I   
   even realized it was actually a 64-bit machine.   
      
   Adam   
   --   
   Registered Linux User #536473   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca