Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux.mandriva    |    Somewhat decent but also getting bloated    |    29,919 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 28,416 of 29,919    |
|    Adam to Aragorn    |
|    Re: x32 or x64?    |
|    29 Jul 12 18:48:20    |
      From: adam@address.invalid              Aragorn wrote:       > On Saturday 21 July 2012 22:41, Warren Post conveyed the following to       > alt.os.linux.mandriva...              >> However, my interest is in learning a general rule of thumb to apply       >> to hardware generally, and not simply "your box is best suited for an       >> X bit OS".       >       > There is no such rule anymore, unless you're really stuck with a box       > that doesn't support more than 2 GiB of RAM, but which still for some       > reason was equipped with a 64-bit processor.              And with 64-bit hardware throughout. My Compaq SR5210NX (bottom-end,       late 2007) is exactly that. It maxed out at 2 GB, came with 32-bit       Vista, and I ran 32-bit OSs on it. It wasn't until last month that I       even realized it was actually a 64-bit machine.              Adam       --       Registered Linux User #536473              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca