Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux.mandriva    |    Somewhat decent but also getting bloated    |    29,919 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 28,734 of 29,919    |
|    TJ to Adam    |
|    Re: OT: ext4 or NTFS for external drive?    |
|    15 Nov 12 09:12:33    |
      From: TJ@noneofyour.business              On 11/13/2012 04:09 PM, Adam wrote:       > TJ wrote:       >> Just bought a 1TB external portable drive.       > [...]       >       > In short, I'd suggest making it into several partitions based on your       > particular needs, and there's nothing wrong with leaving some of it       > unpartitioned for now. Allow a day or more for full r/w testing of all       > the partitions, although of course you can use your computer for       > anything else during that. I'd recommend a thorough r/w test at the       > start, before you have any important data on it and while it's still       > easy to return or exchange should there be any problems.       >       >       Naturally, being the kind of person I am, I'm ignoring part of your       advice for the moment, and using another part.              For the moment, I believe I'm going to leave it as one big partition, in       ext4 format. But, I'm checking for bad blocks as we type. Actually, this       is the second test. On the first one, I used Mageia's MCC and simply       changed the file system from NTFS to ext4. That happened surprisingly       quickly - almost instantly. Made me suspicious, so I did a format,       telling MCC yes, I wanted to check for bad blocks. I used my main       computer, started it about 8PM, and it was done the next morning. Also a       bit surprising. When I checked with a df, I saw that it had the same       931GB of the NTFS system, but only 870-odd were available, and if I add       the amount used to the amount available I came up with a very large       amount unaccounted for. Most disturbing.              So now I'm doing it again, only I'm using my secondary computer. (Nice       thing about having a secondary computer - it's perfect for tasks like       this.) This time, I emptied the original partition, and am creating a       new ext4 partition in its place, again telling MCC to check for bad       blocks. I started it around noon yesterday, and it's still at it, 19       hours later. (Not sure why the difference, as both computers run at       about the same speed and both use USB 2.0, as does the drive, but I       suspect it's because the block size is smaller. Smaller blocks = more       blocks to check = more time to check them.)              I'll give it a few more hours, probably until late tonight, and see what       happens. If I get results that make more sense, I'll reconsider having       multiple partitions.              TJ              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca