Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux.mandriva    |    Somewhat decent but also getting bloated    |    29,919 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 29,012 of 29,919    |
|    Adam to All    |
|    Re: OT: Off-Topic    |
|    10 Feb 13 00:43:45    |
      From: adam@address.invalid              TJ wrote:       > On 02/08/2013 06:32 PM, Adam wrote:       >> since the antibiotic didn't help, my neph/PCP is sending me       >> to an ENT and the first appointment available is a week from Monday, so       >> I expect to spend the next week and a half feeling medium-sick.       >>       > Ah, yes - the ol' medical runaround. Time was when your primary care       > doctor actually treated you, instead of sending you to an overbooked       > specialist for every hangnail.              I think some of that was back when there wasn't more knowledge available       than a G.P. would have. In my case, my primary is already a specialist,       a nephrologist. (Nephrology is a subspecialty of internal medicine and       he's board-certified in both.)              > The unfortunate thing about specialists,       > and I don't just mean medical specialists, is that they don't always pay       > enough attention to things that lead outside outside their specialties.              I learned a lot about that from a book about a surgeon doing his       residency back in the 1950s. Even then, the specialists were very       protective of their areas, and falling afoul of that could result in no       referrals, meaning no work.              At the other extreme, too many things have gone wrong (and not just in       medicine) by people attempting things that they didn't realize were       beyond their competence. (Example: Thiokol's final approval of       Challenger for launch that day being made by management, not engineering.)              > But I suppose that's unfair. Given your conditions, a specialist is the       > proper way to go. It's just that my experiences with specialists that       > didn't help, and one who didn't even want to try to help, and my parents       > is still too fresh in my mind.              I learned a lot about real-world medical practice (as of a few decades       ago, but I'm sure things haven't gotten better) by reading "The Making       of a Surgeon" and "A Surgeon's World" by William A. Nolen, M.D. Nolen       was a practicing general surgeon and even covers a few things doctors       would rather not have mentioned.              > Accuweather.com sports a month-long forecast these days. Thing is, I've       > kept track, and anything beyond about five days is pure fiction.              But a month-long forecast has a certain "impress" value. I agree; I       don't start worrying about weather unless it's predicted to happen       within the next three days or so. This latest dumped about 12-13" here       which all the locals are used to and know how to handle.              > Funny thing about spell checkers, though. I can remember writing an       > email to somebody where my spell checker found the term "back yard" (as       > in "play in the back yard") completely acceptable, but "backyard" (as in       > "Let's have a backyard barbeque") wasn't.              Sometimes I have no idea where spell checkers get their basic list from.        I think some of them must be decades old. I appreciate their flagging       things, but generally unless I've made a typo I trust my judgement more       than theirs. Things I write with Open/LibreOffice tend to be more       formal, but my mail/news is much more colloquial and in particular uses       contractions that are understood by practically all but haven't made it       to some dictionaries yet, like else's, whatever's, and whoever's. I've       even had to add "obvious" words like humidity, cancelled, okay, and women's.              Adam       --       Registered Linux User #536473              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca