From: stryder@telenet.be.invalid   
      
   On Friday 22 November 2013 05:34, Robert Riches conveyed the following   
   to alt.os.linux.mandriva...   
      
   > On 2013-11-21, Aragorn wrote:   
   >   
   >> On Thursday 21 November 2013 15:15, Jim Beard conveyed the following   
   >> to alt.os.linux.mandriva...   
   >>   
   >>> On 11/21/2013 05:18 AM, faeychild wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>> Finally overcame my laziness and fears.   
   >>>> successfully edited the fstab and the partition now mount in the   
   >>>> correct places.   
   >>>> Thanks to all.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> But a small point . During boot the system hangs   
   >>>>   
   >>>> "waiting for device sdb2 to appear"   
   >>>>   
   >>>> and then   
   >>>>   
   >>>> "could not find resume device "   
   >>>>   
   >>>> There was a sdb2 on the old disk but not the new one. There is no   
   >>>> mention of sdb2 in fstab.   
   >>>>   
   >>>> where is coming from   
   >>>   
   >>> UNIX/Linux makes no use of sda2, sda3, sda4, with sda1 by default   
   >>> usually the root partition and sda5 the swap partition.   
   >>   
   >>    
   >>   
   >> /dev/sda1 295M 48M 247M 17% /boot   
   >> /dev/sda3 25G 6.1G 19G 25% /usr   
   >> /dev/sda5 744M 212K 744M 1% /usr/local   
   >> /dev/sda6 1.5G 160K 1.5G 1% /opt   
   >> /dev/sda7 5.9G 385M 5.5G 7% /var   
   >> /dev/sda8 489G 3.8G 485G 1% /home   
   >> /dev/sda9 40G 3.5G 36G 9% /srv   
   >> /dev/sda12 127G 42G 85G 34% /srv/mmedia/video   
   >>   
   >> Note that the above is only a snippet from the output of the df   
   >> command on my machine. The root filesystem is not in that list,   
   >> because I have /etc/mtab as a symlink to /proc/self/mounts, and as   
   >> such the root filesystem appears in the list twice; once as /dev/root   
   >> and once simply as "rootfs". Nevertheless, the root filesystem on   
   >> this machine resides on /dev/sda2.   
   >>   
   >> Also note that the OP is talking of /dev/sdb2, which means that it's   
   >> the /second/ primary partition on the /second/ hard disk.   
   >   
   > Aragorn, I hope you intended that to be HTML rather than XML,   
   > because it's missing the closing tag required by XML. :-)   
      
   I use the "<" and ">" in my posts to denote what would on IRC be   
   considered "an action". ;-) Most people on Usenet use a pair of   
   asterisks for that sort of comments, but then that tends to get   
   interpreted by the newsreader as something which must show in bold, and   
   I was not coughing /that/ loud. :p   
      
   --   
   = Aragorn =   
      
    http://www.linuxcounter.net - registrant #223157   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   
|