Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux.gentoo    |    Stupid OS you gotta compile EVERYTHING    |    17,684 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 15,875 of 17,684    |
|    J.O. Aho to clifto    |
|    Re: /usr/bin/ls missing following stage     |
|    03 Nov 07 22:37:32    |
      From: user@example.net              clifto wrote:       > Unruh wrote:       >> No, /bin is used for files which are crucial and should be available even       >> if the system is in single user mode, where /usr may be on another       >> partition and not even mounted. ls is one of those commands, as is mount,       >> and a variety of others (ls /bin/)       >       > What's the Gentoo concept of /sbin and /usr/sbin? I learned they were for       > statically linked files              As far as I know /sbin is for architecture-dependent and system administrative       tools and is used that way in most distros.                     >, but out of 140 in my /sbin only four are statically linked.              Those shared libs using binaries uses libs in /lib, which should be located on       / as /sbin. You have always busybox to fall back on, if you would break your       system so badly that the shared lib using programs in /sbin wouldn't work.                     > /usr/sbin is worse, one of 262 is statically linked.              Those files aren't as system important as those in /sbin, and therefore can be       dynamically linked.                                   --               //Aho              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca