Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux.gentoo    |    Stupid OS you gotta compile EVERYTHING    |    17,684 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 15,936 of 17,684    |
|    J.O. Aho to Wim Cossement    |
|    Re: Need HW advice for new PC - Which CP    |
|    26 Nov 07 18:37:52    |
      From: user@example.net              Wim Cossement wrote:       > J.O. Aho wrote:       >> Wim Cossement wrote:       >>> J.O. Aho wrote:       >>       >>>> When it comes to the number of cores depends on how much larger you       >>>> want your       >>>> power bill to be. As we have working SMP in Linux, 2+ is ok.       >>> I don't have to pay it but it would be nice to have something that is       >>> capable of using less power when it's not needed.       >>       >> There is the low power version of some of the AMD 64bit CPUs,       >> Tomshardware       >> made a test and got to the conclusion that even if they do use less       >> power in       >> idle mode than normal CPUs, they took longer time to perform the task,       >> whihc       >> resulted in that in the long run, you didn't save much power or even       >> used more       >> power by using those low power CPUs (of course it depends much on how       >> high %       >> of idle time you have).       >       > Thats weird, guess they fucked it up then...       > But I can be pretty idle at times you know! :-)              I don't think they did fuck it up, it's just how physics works              If you have a slower CPU, it needs a longer time to use 100% CPU Power to       perform the encoding of a movie, than a fast CPU.              slow CPU: 1u - 10u       fast CPU: 3u - 20u              Say the encoding takes 10 minutes for the fast CPU while the slow it takes an       hour, for this pseudo-scientific we use units per minute              slow has 2 hours of rest and 1 hour of full work = 720u              fas has 2.83 hours of rest and 0.167 hour of full work = 710u              of course if it's 3 hours of complete idle time, then things looks different,       but it's seldom that you have a CPU that is idle all the time. It should only       be idealistic if the CPU has low loads a few times now and then, but when it's       pressed to use full power it starts to consume more as it has to work a lot       longer.                     --               //Aho              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca