Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux.gentoo    |    Stupid OS you gotta compile EVERYTHING    |    17,684 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 16,390 of 17,684    |
|    J.O. Aho to asdf    |
|    Re: Quad Core for gentoo    |
|    14 Sep 08 10:12:27    |
      From: user@example.net              asdf wrote:       > I'm planning to upgrade my cpu (currently athlon 1800+)       > and wondering if gentoo is multi-core aware.              It depends on if you select to compile your kernel with SMP support and how       many cores you tell is the maximum you want the kernel to support.              Processor type and features --->       [*] Symmetric multi-processing support       (8) Maximum number of CPUs (2-255)              The kernel in the install media has SMP support.              You will have to add the smp USE-flag, so that applications that can take       advantage of multi core, will have the right algorithms compiled into it, or       else they will just not take advantage of the extra cores but run on one at       the time.                     > The processor I had in mind is phenom 9650 quad.              I have one with 9550 and another with 9850, both running fine, the CPU is the       least of the problems, what you may get trouble with is the onboard stuff of       your new motherboard, so I suggest you check that the ethernet is supported in       the kernel before you decide to get the motherboard, most will come with the       crappier HDA as audio and will work in most cases, but IMHO you would be       better off with a SoundBlaster card.                     > Other than OS I mostly will be using firefox, evolution and pan.              None of these applications will take any advantage of 64bit environment or       multi core.                     > Some people suggested       > that i get a dual-core cpu with higher clock speed. Any though       > on whether it will be worth my while to upgrade at all and if       > so should i upgrade to quad or dual core cpu?              Much depends on how you use your computer, if you have just one program at the       time you use, then single core would do (but it starts to be difficult to find       those and aren't worth the price), the more simultanious heavy tasks you are       doing, the more you gain from the number of cores. Going with two cores gives       you a possibility to get a CPU with a higher Hz, but at the same time the dual       cores has older design, so each Hz won't deliver as much power as on a CPu       with a newer design.       Tre-core don't seem to be worth the price, you usually pay the same for a quad       core which has 100MHz less.       A motto I have used, don't buy the most expensive one, as you will regret that       the next week/month when you can get it for half the price you paid for it.       Look at the price tag, don't spend too much money, as you will soon see       octa-core CPUs and that will lower the prices on the quads and kill off the       duals.                     --               //Aho              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca