Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux.slackware    |    I think its the one without Selinux crap    |    87,272 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 85,883 of 87,272    |
|    Henrik Carlqvist to Lew Pitcher    |
|    Re: A modest inquiry: the "meta" package    |
|    13 Jun 22 05:15:15    |
      From: Henrik.Carlqvist@deadspam.com              On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 04:41:45 +0000, Lew Pitcher wrote:       > So, I ask, has anyone here experimented with this metapackage idea? If       > so, how did you approach it, what did you do, and how did it turn out?              Yes, I have done custom packages that does install other packages from       their doinst.sh script. However, the purpose of those packages have not       been to group packages together so my cases has been a little different.       Also, my packages has not included the sub packages, instead I have been       able to rely on the fact that the sub packages has been available on a       mounted NFS directory.              One example of a package installing another package is a package which       checks if the machine has an nVidia card with the binary driver installed       and if so, updates the driver to a newer version.              For initial installation of packages with recursive dependencies I       usually rely on dependency tracking from something like the slpkg       tracking of dependencies from slackbuilds.org. I also have some groups of       packages in separate directories on the NFS server with packages.              As you say, package management is more than installing packages. It is       also about being able to update and remove packages.              regards Henrik              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca