Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux.slackware    |    I think its the one without Selinux crap    |    87,272 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 86,215 of 87,272    |
|    Mike Small to All    |
|    sysklog and Slackware    |
|    06 Mar 23 13:47:15    |
      From: smallm@panix.com              Hi,              I was curious about the history of syslogd in Slackware and the       motivations for using the logging project that it does. I'm reading the       book How Linux Works by Brian Ward, which lists the common logging       possibilities under Linux as involving journald, rsyslog, and/or       syslog-ng.              Slackware instead uses sysklog, a port from the original BSD code that       goes all the way back to Eric Allman and Sendmail, to 1980. 15.0 has a       refreshed version of that by Joachim Wiberg with code from NetBSD and       FreeBSD that implements newer RFCs. Among the few LinuxQuestions threads       I could find on sysklog -- mostly of the "could you patch this bug"       variety --the two sysklogd versions are referred to as the troglobit       version (Wiberg's updates, 2.X) and the infodrom version (Dr. Wettstein,       Martin Schulze, et al; 1.5.1). Wikipedia seems to lack any mention of       sysklog, but /usr/doc has some decent info.              Do you remember any discussions describing this preference vs. other       distros' for rsyslog or syslog-ng? Or do you have your own opinions?              Regards,       Mike Sm.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca