home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.os.linux.slackware      I think its the one without Selinux crap      87,272 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 87,025 of 87,272   
   noel to All   
   Re: Warning, atop has issues(?)   
   30 Mar 25 21:22:41   
   
   From: deletethis@invalid.lan   
      
   That wasnt a question moron, it was rhetorical...   
      
   and only '07 in here, ahh you must ber Dan C , he dissapreaed around that   
   time, witness protection eh. But as Shania says "that dont impress me   
   much" half of us here have been here since the 90's, and 2400bps modems.   
   self appointed net-cops arent welcome, you either read a post or you   
   dont, since me top posting triggers your OCD, best you dont read mine, or   
   go cry to someone who gives a fuck.   
      
      
      
   On Sun, 30 Mar 2025 05:50:43 +0000, Auric__ wrote:   
      
   >> On Sat, 29 Mar 2025 23:49:37 +0000, Auric__ wrote:   
   >>   
   >>>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2025 01:31:46 +0000, John McCue wrote:   
   >>>>   
   >>>>> Hi All   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Ran across this:   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43477057   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Seems atop may be 'bad', I noticed there is a slackbuild for atop.   
   >>>>>   
   >>>>> Below from https://rachelbythebay.com/w/2025/03/25/atop/   
   >>> [snip]   
   >>>   
   >>> ...and then noel wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> If one wants people to stop using something, one needs to explain   
   >>>> why,   
   >>>> else, why should we (I dont, never have used atop) without   
   >>>> justifiable reason.   
   >>>   
   >>> [Please don't top-post.]   
   >>>   
   >>> Rachel published a very-slightly-less-vague follow-up:   
   >>>   https://rachelbythebay.com/w/2025/03/26/atop/   
   > [snip]   
   >   
   > ...then noel spouted:   
   >   
   >> dont top post?   
   >   
   > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.   
   > Q: Why is it such a bad thing?   
   > A: Top-posting.   
   > Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet and in e-mail?   
   >   
   >> who the fuck do you think you are, you come in here, some johnny come   
   >> lately newbie,   
   >   
   > I've been in this group on-and-off since 2007. I've been on Usenet since   
   > the 90s. I've been online since the WWW was in diapers. "Doesn't post   
   > very often" doesn't mean "new".   
   >   
   >> expecting people to follow links, like thats not been used by vermin   
   >> malware scum before   
   >   
   > I don't "expect" you to do anything. You may note that the original post   
   > by Mr. McCue included two links; is he also "vermin malware scum"? My   
   > link happens to be the same site as his second link.   
   >   
   > If you don't want to follow my link, then don't.   
   >   
   >> and then trying to tell us how to post, piss off moron.   
   >   
   > Ah, yes, the impending death of netiquette creeps ever closer.   
      
   --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca