From: someone@somewhere.com   
      
   David Chmelik  wrote:   
   > [...snip...]   
   > Well, I only use normally-numbered long-term/stable/user,   
   > not hash-numbered commit/experimental/testing versions,   
      
   I typically use -current, but your remark got me curious:   
     if, say, during the last 10 years I'd installed/re-installed   
   -current 100 times at random intervals, then how many times   
   would package bugs, that weren't present in -stable, have   
   caused "noticeable" (whatever that means) problems?   
     That is, what percentage of -current releases have   
   non-trivial problems not also present in -stable?   
   --   
   John Forkosh   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)