Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux.suse    |    Suse is actually not that bad    |    138,051 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 136,206 of 138,051    |
|    Aragorn to All    |
|    Re: plasma5 issue    |
|    04 Mar 17 12:40:38    |
      From: thorongil@telenet.be              On Saturday 04 March 2017 11:49, grinch conveyed the following to       alt.os.linux.suse...              > Sprang is quite right ,basically if the plasma 5 does not have a       > working network connection it falls over ,simple as that.              Now, I'm still using Plasma 4 here, but I've never heard of Plasma (or       any of the older KDE versions) falling over if it doesn't get a network       connection.              More likely would be that something specific ─ like the Network Manager       applet or ntpd would be trying to connect to the internet and would be       failing after a timeout.              If anything, it has been my experience that GNOME tends to whine about       not having an IP address or an FQDN. And that's because GNOME ─ and       GTK+ in general, upon which also MATE, Cinnamon, Xfce and LXDE are built       ─ is a meddlesome nanny.              > If I log into xfce and setup the wifi network then log out again       > plasma works.              That has nothing to do with Xfce or with Plasma, but with the Network       Manager, for which there exists both a GTK+ front-end and a Qt front-       end.              > I had never tried KDE on top of xfce it is noticeably faster on the       > same hardware than the native plasma 5 perhaps that is a way forward.              That's ridiculous. First of all, you cannot run KDE/Plasma "on top of"       Xfce. Plasma runs either on top of the X Window System or on top of the       Wayland compositor.              You /can/ run KDE _applications_ in Xfce ─ or GNOME, Unity, Cinnamon,       LXDE, Enlightenment or whatever ─ if you have the KDE base libraries       installed, but none of that has anything to do with Xfce, and the       performance of those applications would be the same.              In fact, if there is any difference in performance, then the KDE       applications would be running faster in Plasma, because Plasma pre-loads       the shared libraries those applications use, whereas with another       desktop environment, the application has to call for those shared       libraries to be loaded separately, which will increase your memory       footprint, and ─ if you have very little RAM ─ may thus lead to       swapping.              KDE Plasma is built using the Qt widget libraries. Xfce is built using       the GKT+ widget libraries. So long as you have both sets of libraries       installed, it doesn't matter what desktop environment you're running.       The applications only look at those libraries, and all your Xfce does in       that regard is offer the window manager functions to allow those       applications to interface with the underlying X11 server ─ or with       Wayland, whichever applies to your situation ─ and appear on your screen       with window borders and a title bar, so that you can move them, resize       them, maximize them and minimize them.              --       = Aragorn =              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca