Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux.suse    |    Suse is actually not that bad    |    138,051 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 136,877 of 138,051    |
|    Carlos E.R. to F Russell    |
|    Re: Why the DE?    |
|    06 Oct 19 23:35:05    |
      XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy       From: robin_listas@es.invalid              On 05/10/2019 16.09, F Russell wrote:       > Why is it necessary to have a "desktop environment?"       >       > AFAIK, most Linux distros are equipped with a DE of some       > kind, usually Gnome or KDE.       >       > But Linux has virtual terminals and window managers, and       > only these are required for any and all meaningful work       > within a graphical environment. So why the DE?       >       > For me the DE is a total, inexcusable, and blatant waste.       >       > I use xterm(s) and fvwm. Over time I've tried many other       > combinations and even many DEs, but nothing beats xterm(s)       > and fvwm.       >       > So why the DE? Is it because the DE mimics somewhat the       > feeling of that de facto standard known as MS Windows       > and therefore gives the (pseudo)-Linux user a taste       > of home?       >       > I do not understand, cannot understand, and will not       > understand the illusory superiority of the DE.       > Linux is better off without the DE and without the       > developmental attention that is given to the DE.       >              LOL :-)              --       Cheers, Carlos.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca