home bbs files messages ]

Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"

   alt.os.linux.suse      Suse is actually not that bad      138,051 messages   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]

   Message 137,298 of 138,051   
   William Unruh to kant@have.it   
   Re: Dualhomed, sort of solved.   
   03 Aug 21 05:00:13   
   
   From: unruh@invalid.ca   
      
   On 2021-08-03, Sidney_Kotic  wrote:   
   > Basically, at this time, it looks to have almost completely came down to the   
   > fight to get both Wicked and Network Manager happy along with different ways   
   > yast works between 15.1 and 15.3.   
   >   
   > I had to switch to Wicked to change ANYTHING in yast.  Unfortunately after   
   > exiting yast the network wouldn't work.  Everything looked good (ip a, ip   
   route,   
   > netstat -nr, ifconfig, route -n) but the network was pretty much useless.   
   > Go back to yast, switch to Network Manager (Note...making a change to   
   something   
   > and then switching back to Network Manager then exit...and the changes   
   > disappear...make changes, exit, go back in switch to Network Manager, then   
   exit   
   > and the changes stay...loved this).  At that point the WiFi (192.168.1.* on   
   > wlan0) would generally work, but not eth0 (10.10.13.*).  Fight with it a bit   
   and   
   > I've managed to get eth0 working.  Then there was the netmask...yast kept   
   trying   
   > to assign a netmask of /32 for the 10.10.13.* network, changed it to /24 and   
   > things seemed to settle down.  Got me.   
   >   
   > So, currently I have 3 computers running WiFi (ssh/rsync back and forth, plus   
   > normal stuff to the internet) on wlan0 and cat-5 on eth0.  Using the eth0   
   > Computer A (the 15.1 machine) can ssh/rsync to computer B (a 15.3 machine),   
   but   
   > not Computer C (also a 15.3 machine).  Computer B can ssh/rsync to Computer A   
   > but not Computer C.  Computer C can ssh/rsync to both Computer A and   
   Computer B.   
   >   This tells me, and please tell me if I'm wrong, it's a firewall issue on   
   > Computer C.  Although I haven't spotted anything yet.  I guess it's time to   
   > fireoff wireshark, see who said what, and try to figure out where the   
   firewall   
   > logs are kept.   
   >   
   > As a FYI the metrics are 100 for eth0 and 600 for wlan0.   
   > bill@kraken:~> route -n   
      
   What machine is kraken?   
      
   > Kernel IP routing table   
   > Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags Metric Ref    Use Iface   
   > 0.0.0.0         192.168.1.1     0.0.0.0         UG    600    0        0 wlan0   
   > 10.10.13.0      0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     100    0        0 eth0   
   > 192.168.1.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U     600    0        0 wlan0   
      
   The metrics do not matter. The paths to everything are unique.   
   Anything to tne net 198.168.1.x go onto wlan0 local network (Your   
   computer will ask for arp to find the ehternet addresses for any ip   
   address in that range.   
   Anything to 10.10.13.x goes onto eth0 local net   
   Anything else gets sent to 192.168.1.1 via wlan0   
   No idea why you think it is a firewall issue, but why not switch off the   
   firewall on C and see if things work.   
      
   Since you have not told us what the IP addresses are for A B and C, we   
   really cannot say anything.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)   

[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]


(c) 1994,  bbs@darkrealms.ca