Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux.suse    |    Suse is actually not that bad    |    138,051 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 137,300 of 138,051    |
|    Sidney_Kotic to All    |
|    Re: Networking problem.    |
|    06 Aug 21 19:49:56    |
      From: kant@have.it              On 8/6/21 4:11 PM, William Unruh wrote:              Thanks for the reply. Let me see if I can clear up some confusion.              These are the relevant /etc/hosts entries.       >> 192.168.1.2 crab       >> 192.168.1.3 kraken       >> 192.168.1.5 shrimp              >> 10.10.13.4 c       >> 10.10.13.2 k       >> 10.10.13.3 s              All the 192.168.1.* hosts are on wlan0. All the 10.10.13.* hosts are on eth0.       So crab IS c depending on whether it's wlan0 or eth0. On wlan0 its IP is       192.168.1.2 (and that's how it gets to the internet) and on eth0 it uses       10.10.13.4 for an IP address.              > I really have no idea what it is you are trying to do.              I live in a building where there are WiFi routers everywhere. Right now I       could, if I had the correct password, use any one of the probably 20+ routers       the computers see, if I had to guess I'd say there are about 150 WiFi routers       in       this building. All of those routers are fighting to use the same 2.4/5Ghz       frequencies. Heck when I had to get a replacement cable modem the company gave       me a new one that has a builtin WiFi router, meaning I have 2 WiFi routers       running (ironically they're wired together with a cable, probably on       192.168.0.*       network).       By using the eth0, an old switch, and cables, I can pass traffic between c, k,       and s without adding to the WiFi traffic. I often move large 1Gb to 2Gb files       between these 3 computers. WiFi network throughput is often abysmal.              > I would suggest that you give them different names on the two networks              They do have different names, and IP addresses on different interfaces.              To try and put it succinctly.       1. All the computers work on the wlan0/192.168.1.* network.       2. The hosts k and s work fine on the eth0/10.10.13.* network. So it works.       3. Neither hosts k or s can initiate a connect to host c on the       eth0/10.10.13.*       network. This is the problem.       4. Host c can initiate connects to hosts k and s fine on the eth0/10.10.13.*       network. This is important as it shows the eth0 interface on host c does work.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca