Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux.suse    |    Suse is actually not that bad    |    138,051 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 137,415 of 138,051    |
|    NFN Smith to Andrew    |
|    Re: OpenSUSE and Seamonkey    |
|    15 Dec 21 14:14:21    |
      XPost: alt.comp.software.seamonkey       From: worldoff9908@gmail.com              Andrew wrote:       > Today I asked the maintainer if he could update the version in "Update"       > to a more recent released level, and this was his reply.       >       >> I'm afraid there's nothing I can do -- I've been su       mitting the new versions as soon as they've been releas       d, but they've all been stuck in legal review.  I and        other packagers have been occasionally nudging the        lawyers but we never hear back from them.       >>       >       > Does anyone know why a new Seamonkey level requires "legal review", in       > particular when this level is freely available in anot       er repository anyway.       >       > When Tristan refers to "other packagers", that reads as though other       > products are also affected. What the F is going on here? Are the       > lawyers getting involved in things which do not concern them?              I don't have any inside information, just speculation.              My best guess is that they've decided that review is needed to ensure       that a formal release doesn't have any copyrighted code in it that would       potentially expose them to lawsuits.              Even if the same stuff is in the Test repository, the expectation is       that paying users are going to be using the stuff that officially       released in the Update repository.              "other packagers" is likely to be the maintainers of other packages that       have to jump through the same hoops to get their stuff released.              I agree that it's annoying, especially for work that's limited to bug       and security fixes and no new code. But I think the reviewers are       looking for inclusion of new stuff that may have intellectual property       restrictions.              Unfortunately, where potential legal liabilities are at stake,       everything is of concern to the lawyers.              Smith              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca