Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux.suse    |    Suse is actually not that bad    |    138,051 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 137,418 of 138,051    |
|    Andrew to bad sector    |
|    Re: OpenSUSE and Seamonkey    |
|    16 Dec 21 18:26:13    |
      From: Doug@hyperspace.vogon.gov              bad sector wrote:       > On 12/15/21 6:49 PM, Carlos E. R. wrote:       >> On 15/12/2021 21.30, Andrew wrote:       >>> OpenSUSE has Seamonkey in two repositories, the main Update       >>> repository and the Mozilla Test repository. This is about 42.3 Leap       >>> by the way.       >>>       >>> The level I'm running here - 2.53.8.1 - is the last one which made       >>> the Update repository, although the Mozilla Test repository gets       >>> all of the release versions and - it seems - at least some of the       >>> beta versions.       >>>       >>> Today I asked the maintainer if he could update the version in       >>> "Update" to a more recent released level, and this was his reply.       >>       >> For Leap 42.3? I doubt he can do any update at all for that obsolete       >> version.       >>       >>>       >>>> I'm afraid there's nothing I can do -- I've been submitting the       >>>> new versions as soon as they've been released, but they've all       >>>> been stuck in legal review. I and other packagers have been       >>>> occasionally nudging the lawyers but we never hear back from       >>>> them.       >>>       >>> Does anyone know why a new Seamonkey level requires "legal       >>> review", in particular when this level is freely available in       >>> another repository anyway. When Tristan refers to "other       >>> packagers", that reads as though other products are also affected.       >>> What the F is going on here? Are the lawyers getting involved in       >>> things which do not concern them?       >>       >> Every package in openSUSE has to pass a legal review, at least if it       >> is to be published as official package.       >>       >> -- Cheers,       >>       >> Carlos E.R.       >       > A lot of headaches could be avoided if an effort was made       > to assure that (in addition to 'packaged' distro rpms that I       > have really absolutely nothing against) the original source       > code tarball released by originating devs were ALWAYS compilable       > without any hickups.       >       >       >       >       >              Not as trivial as it seems. Rust is currently becoming the next big       system language, Seamonkey is dependent on a version of Rust > n being       installed (so far so good) but some other packages require a lower       level. Newer levels are not necessarily 100% compatible.       openSUSE has taken steps to permit multiple levels of Rust to co-exist       for just this reason.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca