From: malcolmlewis@linuxmail.org.invalid   
      
   On Sat, 5 Feb 2022 23:49:37 -0500   
   bad sector  wrote:   
      
   > On 2/5/22 21:14, Paul R Schmidtbleicher wrote:   
   > > *I have c.900 files that tell me there is an upgrade   
   > > *I have tumbleweed and therefore command    
   > > *About 15 problems are listed 13 are suggesting I have a new   
   > > packman program that is wanting to "upgraded" to and older suse   
   > > repository program.   
   > > *The Level of change is like ***.1.1.6.2 (Packman) down to   
   > > ***.1.1.5.1 Suse   
   > > *From older versions of OpenSuse, I believe Packman programs were   
   > > added to circumvent some of the "hobbling" OpenSuse was "legally"   
   > > needing to do. *Only two options (1) Replace "obsolete" **.6.2   
   > > packman with **.5.1 suse OR (2) keep "obsolete" **.6.2 packman   
   > >   
   > > Without going deeper I chose #2 in all 13 cases. What would your   
   > > advise have been?   
   >   
   > that's what I do too   
   >   
   > my advice would be for zypper to respect 'use packman repo' prefs   
   > set up in Yast, which doesn't seem to be the case   
   >   
   >   
   >   
   Hi   
   A bad move.... there have been recent changes on the multimedia side   
   and should let the gstreamer packages change, the number of packages   
   look familiar (15~16 problems).   
      
   As Tumbleweed users it would behoove you to add openSUSE Factory and   
   Packman Mailing lists to nntp (I use gmane)....   
      
   --   
   Cheers Malcolm °¿° SUSE Knowledge Partner (Linux Counter #276890)   
   Tumbleweed 20220204 | GNOME Shell 41.3 | 5.16.4-1-default   
   HP Z440 | Xeon E5-2690 V3 X24 @ 2.60GHz | AMD RX550/Nvidia Quadro T400   
   up 2 days 1:34, 2 users, load average: 0.53, 0.42, 0.40   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)