Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux.suse    |    Suse is actually not that bad    |    138,051 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 137,717 of 138,051    |
|    Carlos E.R. to bad sector    |
|    Re: Yast Boot Loader setup    |
|    22 Mar 23 12:05:06    |
      From: robin_listas@es.invalid              On 2023-03-22 11:54, bad sector wrote:       > On 3/21/23 22:05, Carlos E.R. wrote:       >> On 2023-03-22 02:23, bad sector wrote:       >       >>>>> ...as opposed to a common swap which, theologically, would just       >>>>> preclude any form of resurrection?       >>>>       >>>> Huh?       >>>       >>> Use of a swap partition common to all systems would prevent one of       >>> those systems from ever 'resurrecting' after having entered       >>> hybernation if in between another system got booted and made use of       >>> that swap partition. I don't have a problem with this, but it seems       >>> to me that I'm having fewer issues all around since I have started       >>> using dedicated swaps.       >>       >> I told you that:       >>       >> Boot A partition       >> Hibernate A partition       >>       >> Boot B partition       >> halt B partition       >>       >> Thaw A partition       >>       >> is a recipe for disaster, don't ever do it.       >>       >> Yes, having a single swap avoids this, so it is a good thing. Precisely.       >>       >>> But none of this is getting me any closer to getting a handle on the       >>> difference between 1 & 3 in the OP, or on the need to use the system       >>> partition as a "Boot Partition" when there already is a definitive       >>> "BIOS Boot" partition. I figure a little more verbose help bubbles on       >>> that dialog would be useful.       >>       >> I already told you that selecting 1 and 3 is not a problem at all.       >> Even 1, 2 and 3 simultaneously is fine, if you wish.       >>       >> 1 writes to the current partition that was used for booting the       >> current system.       >>       >> 3 lets you specify which partition.       >>       >> 2 writes to the master boot record of the hard disk.       >       > I didn't think it was a PROBLEM, I wanted to know what it does and why       > it's preselected by default at all but especially in view of equal       > choice #1 which is already selected before it. So, assumingthat it's       > just the coder's way to try to assure a bulletproof boot the next time I       > can live with that and even applaud it (especially if right below the       > uuid window it'd say in small print "current partition preselected only       > for lack of a different user directive".              No, it is not the default.              It happens in your case for some reason I can't know. For example       because it was done this way initially, and YaST remembers.              For example, writing to the MBR on my laptop #1 would render it unbootable.              --       Cheers, Carlos.              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca