From: mutazilah@gmail.com   
      
   On 22/02/24 20:48, J.O. Aho wrote:   
   > On 22/02/2024 10.57, Richard Kettlewell wrote:   
   >> Paul Edwards  writes:   
   >   
   >>> I guess it's just a semantic debate as to whether this constitutes a   
   >>> change in behavior.   
   >>   
   >> This would go a lot quicker if you didn’t engage in “semantic   
   debates”.   
   >   
   > For me it whole feels like a repeat of systemd when they stupidly picked   
   > a namespace already used by the kernel and wanted the kernel to change   
   > nem of their namespace.   
   >   
   > The whole can be solved in the header to define missing macro.   
      
   Define it to what? That's my original question.   
      
   And by who?   
      
   BFN. Paul.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)