From: user@example.net   
      
   On 17/03/2024 21.22, bad sector wrote:   
      
   > As for more than one 'mere utility' that seems to be jockeying to become   
   > a kernel or an almost-OS, my attitude is rapidly hardening. The danger   
   > as far as I'm concerned is that one of thsese becomes too big for its   
   > hide and starts dictating kernel development which would mean the end of   
   > freedom Linux.   
      
   They did try with the namespace-controversy where they demanded the   
   Linux kernel developers to change the name iof a namespace for they had   
   picked to use the same spacename. I think much of the bad attitude came   
   from Lennart Poettering and lets hope there will be a "pipewire" for   
   systemd too.   
      
   For me it's been more of the security concern, they assume quite a lot   
   of things in the code without really knowing and the more code they have   
   in systemd the more risk for security issues and they already top   
   numbers of critical security issues compared with the other init systems   
   (I think it's quite same to say combined).   
      
   --   
     //Aho   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)