XPost: comp.os.linux.misc   
   From: Sh@dow.br   
      
   On Fri, 27 Sep 2024 17:36:29 -0000 (UTC), Rich    
   wrote:   
      
   >In comp.os.linux.misc Nux Vomica  wrote:   
   >> It seems that a lot of users are, irrationally, opposed to the   
   >> use of optical media for long-term archival storage.   
   >   
   >Having personally experienced failures of both cd-r and dvd-r media   
   >wherein the recorded media became unreadable in a very short timeframe   
   >(only a few years) even with proper storage it is not at all irrational   
   >to be skeptical of claims of significant lifetimes for optical media   
   >(esp.  the user recordable type, pressed disks are a different matter).   
   >Existing user recordable optical systems have, so far, had a poor track   
   >record, so any new system has a higher bar to get over before it is   
   >trusted for any long-term archive use.   
   >   
      
   	I back up to DVD. Some of my backups (CDs) are 30 years old,   
   and > 99% work perfectly. Since optical media is dirt cheap, I do   
   duplicate backups, and if one gives a read error, I include its better   
   half in my next backup.   
   	I use USB pendrives for very short term storage, and rotate.   
   They tend to go bad.   
   	As to storing sensitive data on someone else's computer, LOL,   
   why not give them all your passwords and company secrets too?   
   	[]'s   
   --   
   Don't be evil - Google 2004   
   We have a new policy  - Google 2012   
   Google Fuchsia - 2021   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)