Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux    |    Getting to be as bloated as Windows!    |    107,822 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 106,554 of 107,822    |
|    Paul to The Natural Philosopher    |
|    Re: Alternative to Optical Storage????    |
|    30 Sep 24 19:34:44    |
      XPost: comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.linux.misc       From: nospam@needed.invalid              On Mon, 9/30/2024 7:25 AM, The Natural Philosopher wrote:              > No one knows till they power up a 40 year old drive whether or not the data       is either still there, or is recoverable.       >              There are properties studied in isolation, but there       does not seem to be that much research interest in the       archival properties of hard drives.              Part of the reason, is the physical construction is always       changing, and each era can have a different failure mechanism.              The chances of the drive making it to 70 years and not having       enough magnetic signal, are pretty limited. You are just as       likely, to suffer some other kind of failure. And the Helium drives,       they remove all the uncertainty about 70 years as a target figure.       The glass platters and the loss of helium, say hi. The platters       had to be made thinner, to put ten platters in an inch thick drive.              As home users, our usage of hard drives for backup, is purely       coincidental. The hard drive companies do not place a premium on       that behavior or application. The drive has as priority,       nearline storage and "as much capacity as you can manage". That's       why the Helium drives are a poor match for what a home user       might wish to achieve. A home user, uses Flash, because Microsoft       told them to. They back up their flash (whether eMMC, SSD, NVMe),       with a hard drive. But then it depends on what kind of hard drive       they bought, whether they are "well covered". The 6TB air breathers       are still a good choice for archival storage. The 24TB Helium drives       on the other hand, they're not a good match for archival store.              This is an archival drive. 20 years from now, this will work.       "Do Not Cover Any Drive Holes" means it is an air breather (no helium).       There could be 3 to 6 platters (they stopped reporting platters in       the data sheet, a long time ago, as well as honestly reporting       CMR versus PMR). 4 platters is a good number, but they could       do it with 3 platters now.              "WD Black 6TB"              https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/Hh8AAOSw2~VlRLQm/s-l1600.jpg              This is not an archival drive. The outer lid is welded on.       It does not unscrew at the Data Recovery lab. Your data is       trapped in there, and it ain't comin back.              "WD Gold 24TB"              https://cdn.mos.cms.futurecdn.net/nJ59TSmXcVxrM35UVnYJzF-1200-80.jpg.webp              One of the drive companies, put a pressure sensor in SMART, but       it's not documented, so we can't "plot helium pressure versus year" for fun.       The other company didn't put anything in that slot. I have not seen       any info, on the number of BARs of gas pressure in there. It is whatever       amount of gas that is needed, to make the heads "fly". And a drive like       that, is likely to have the fly sensor (DSP measures head current, to       compute flying height on a write). A WD Blue 1TB drive, has sweet nothing,       in terms of technical content, and it does not sense flying height.       It doesn't need to. It doesn't have piezo positioners right at the head.       If you put eight WD Blue 1TB in a drive rack, the vibration from all       the drives, would prevent them from performing properly. One WD Blue 1TB       by itself should be fine.              I had a WD Blue and the farking thing was on one of the six axis       allowed for drives, but the drive is NOT happy, if half way through       its life, you change the orientation. Once you pick to run it horizontal,       keep running it horizontal. Don't flip it upside down, if you can       avoid it. There was a time, when horizontal was the only axis allowed.       But that changed at some point, to a six axis specification (horizontal       right side up, horizontal upside down, being two of them).               Paul              --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca