XPost: comp.os.linux.misc, comp.os.linux.advocacy   
   From: crude@sausa.ge   
      
   On 2024-10-24 7:40 a.m., The Natural Philosopher wrote:   
   > On 24/10/2024 12:31, bad sector wrote:   
   >> On 10/23/24 17:29, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:   
   >>> On Wed, 23 Oct 2024 13:01:18 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:   
   >>>   
   >>>> I don't even think they deserve to be called leftists anymore. They are   
   >>>> stupid and should be called such. There is the right and the stupid.   
   >>>   
   >>> Have you anti-abortionists figured out yet whether you support IVF or   
   >>> not?   
   >>> Does “life begin at conception” apply in a Petri dish as well, or   
   >>> only in   
   >>> a woman’s body?   
   >>   
   >> Humanitary exception can be made in the case of a married hetero   
   >> couple who cannot procreate otherwise, and what the left calls   
   >> anti-abortion is actually anti-UNCONDITIONAL-abortion i.e. anti   
   >> abortion-as-birth-control. That said, society should require   
   >> cognitive, IQ, and psy. testing for a permit to marry, procreate,   
   >> vote, drive a car or own guns, the last two on a yearly basis. The   
   >> left is misreading and twisting everything ever since it created the   
   >> twiggy movement (to eat no fats) because its barbie-boy neo-males with   
   >> trimmed little goaties to appear more masculine than they actually are   
   >> needed a skinny less intimidating female form promising easier access   
   >> to underdeveloped sexual organs. Unfortunately fats are needed by the   
   >> brain to function. Enter the WOKE generation: mama-molested fuckbrain   
   >> zombies.   
   >>   
   >>   
   >   
   > Christ on a bike.   
      
   Heresy.   
      
   > In the end women wanting to rid themselves of a child always find a way.   
      
   So let's not even _try_ to child, right? Only stupid people can be this   
   pessimistic.   
      
   > Half of the argument to legalise it was to get rid of 'back street'   
   > abortionists feeding poisons to or sticking knitting needles in the mother.   
   >   
   > Many of whom died.   
   >   
   > Having different laws to a next door country simply encourages abortion   
   > tourism. Plenty of nice Irish catholic girls took a trip to London...   
   >   
   > ..if it was outlawed in Montana, they would doubtless find a short trip   
   > to California of use...   
      
   If the infanticide procedure itself costs them something, they shouldn't   
   worry about the cost of the trip to a state where such infanticide is   
   permitted. As long as taxpayers don't have to share the burden, I have   
   no issue.   
      
   > But the whole mess is all part of people taking up *moral* positions.   
   >   
   > Buying into to socialists 'fairness' and 'justice' or religious 'right   
   > to life' and other such hand wavery bollocks.   
   >   
   > The fact is that legalisation brought no more abortions, just less   
   > deaths of mothers.   
      
   I apologize for not crying over the mothers who would willingly   
   sacrifice both child and themselves.   
      
   --   
   CrudeSausage   
   Paleoconservative, Catholic, Christ is king.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)