XPost: comp.os.linux.misc, comp.os.linux.advocacy   
   From: joelcrump@gmail.com   
      
   bad sector  wrote:   
      
   >>> Whoever did whatever in South Africa never did, never will, and   
   >>> certainly doesn't define what is meant by any term elsewhere and that   
   >>> includes 'illegal alien'. Illegal = unauthorised, unlawful; alien =   
   >>> foreign, potentially hostile. Nothing complicated really i.e. a squatter   
   >>>from elsewhere as would be someone who just waltzes into your   
   >>> living-room and pitches tent there uninvited.   
   >>   
   >> Uh huh.  You ever hear of Christopher Columbus?   
   >   
   >Sure, far too much even; he was a paper christian if at all whom the   
   >vatican was about to BBQ so he quickly found himself a sweetheart deal   
   >with the spanish queen to get the fuck outta Dodge and just in time.   
   >   
   >> Was he born in the   
   >> Americas?  Or did he just declare land to be the property of Spain,   
   >> without any rational basis?  What the fuck do you think crackers   
   >> coming here were, if not "illegal immigrants"?   
   >   
   >What DECIDED whom the land belonged to was the size of the Spanish navy,   
   >also the British, the French, and the German to name the top guns. When   
   >did you get off the boat?   
   >   
   >> Just because the   
   >> indigenous people hadn't created a system of government to make a law,   
   >> against their arrival?  Despite the fact whities massacred indigenous   
   >> people, to gain territory here?   
   >   
   >Laws without power mean didley shit, but who was talking about the USA?   
   >What is it with Americans that unless someone specifically says 'this is   
   >not about the USA' they always think that everyone on usenet is by   
   >default thinking and talking about them? The illegal migrant problem is   
   >at crisis levels in Europe for example, far worse than stateside.   
   >   
   >> Wake the fuck up.   
   >   
   >Land is like a woman, belongs to the last man standing subject only to   
   >her wanting any of him regardless. There is no ancestral 'right' that I   
   >know of or would accept.   
      
      
   You're a fucking pig.   
      
   --   
   Joel W. Crump   
      
   Amendment XIV   
   Section 1.   
      
   [...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall   
   abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the   
   United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of   
   life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;   
   nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal   
   protection of the laws.   
      
   Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are   
   liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.   
      
   --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05   
    * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)