Forums before death by AOL, social media and spammers... "We can't have nice things"
|    alt.os.linux    |    Getting to be as bloated as Windows!    |    107,822 messages    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
|    Message 106,840 of 107,822    |
|    Paul to Ed Cryer    |
|    Re: So far OT ..... DVD+R v DVD-R ... Wh    |
|    18 Feb 25 09:57:52    |
      XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11       From: nospam@needed.invalid              On Sun, 2/16/2025 12:01 PM, Ed Cryer wrote:       > Rick wrote:       >> On 2/16/2025 8:39 AM, Daniel70 wrote:       >>> I've got a PVR who's HD is getting pretty full (90%+) with programs I'll       want to watch some day ... so I was thinking about coping some of the 'Keeper'       programs onto DVD which meant buying a spool of DVD's.... but then needed to       check if I needed DVD-       R or DVD+R disks. (It is DVD-R)       >>>       >>> Which got me thinking ...... What's the difference between DVD-R and       DVD+R??       >>>       >>> (Note ... I'm not discussing R v RW, just the -/+.)       >>>       >>> Back in the day (70's/80's), I used to do some Digital work where 'they'       talked about Positive Logic (Ones = +5V, Zeros = Zero volts) and Negative       Logic (Ones = Zero Volts and Zeros = +5V or even Ones = -5V and Zeros = Zero       Volts), so I can        understand/accept that there are differences ..... but with DVDs??       >>>       >>> On a +R DVD, are the 'Ones' high points on the disk whilst on a -R DVD are       the 'ones' the low points on the disk?? (Or, rather than 'highs' and 'lows',       is it a case of the orientations of the 'North Poles' and 'South Poles' of the       Domains??)       >>       >> I haven't done a lot with DVD discs in years, but I agree with those who       say that if you are using modern equipment there is not a big difference       between them. I had a slight preference for the +R, but usually based       purchase decisions on prices and        deals. I would normally look to spend around 25 cents US per disc (100 for       $25 was a good deal) but have no idea what prices are like nowadays.       >>       >> A far bigger issue in the old days was the brand of disc. While I       eventually tended to buy Verbatim, I used several other brands at different       times, and there were a few like Magnavox that were pretty bad and I tried to       avoid them. Nowadays, with        external drives being so cheap and having such large capacities, I rarely use       DVDs and would probably have to hunt around to find an external DVD drive if I       needed to create one.       >       > I've used Verbatim -R for decades; and never had a fail. Seldom used these       days, but the other day I needed one for a downloaded OS.iso. I got one from a       package in the cupboard (been there for well over 12 years) and it went just       fine.       > I also have wallets with recorded Verbatim -R discs from over 20 years ago.       I try one now and again; and never a single fail.       > Some of the players are old, some only 5 or so years.       > I think I'd give Verbatim a 10/10 rating.       >       > Ed              Considering they are mostly a middle-man, that's a high compliment.              To their credit, they use a five digit part number. If someone on the       Internet were to say "their 12345 product gave a good result", if       you bought the 12345 product you would see the same. They likely source       all of a particular SKU, from a single manufacturer. So if the product       was made by Ritek, and was 12345 Verbatim, then buying that a year       later it would still be Ritek and with the same media tag.              Verbatim seems to own some physical facilities now. They may have       acquired a company that makes jewel boxes for housing discs. They may       have acquired M-Disc factory (only part of it). A few other things       would still be the arms length, buy-a-lot-from-a-factory type business.              It's unclear, why more of the foreign suppliers did not do direct marketing       of their own. Ritek could easily have purchased cake boxes and packaged up       their stuff, shutting down innumerable middle-men as a side effect. But       they didn't do that.              That's why, one year, Ritek was only available as stacks of bare       discs, *wrapped in Saran Wrap*. Surely the most stupid packaging exercise       ever practiced by my computer store. And that's because Ritek never ever       put their stuff in a cake box. When the end came, they sold raw discs,       and the store didn't have cake boxes either, so they used Saran Wrap.       Did the users buy those that way ? I don't think so. You can't hump       Saran wrapped piles of DVDs around your livingroom. They will spill       all over the floor.              At least Verbatim has cake boxes. But the media itself comes, most       of the time, from someone else. It's only at the collapse and end       of the industry, that Verbatim has acquired small factory setups of its       own. Because, no other supplier could stretch themselves to take       these factories "into the fold". One of the factories, has       competing employees working elbow to elbow, as a "joint venture",       until the market is gone at least. More cats sleeping with dogs.       Rather than throw the equipment away, the factory doubled up,       the employees went with it (because the chemistry is a trade       secret and some of them know how to make discs).               Paul              --- SoupGate-DOS v1.05        * Origin: you cannot sedate... all the things you hate (1:229/2)    |
[   << oldest   |   < older   |   list   |   newer >   |   newest >>   ]
(c) 1994, bbs@darkrealms.ca